The online tool for teaching with documents, from the National Archives

Magna Carta's Influence on America

Making Connections

All documents and text associated with this activity are printed below, followed by a worksheet for student responses.

Introduction

Magna Carta was written by 13th-century barons in England to protect their rights and property against a tyrannical king. It's concerned with many practical matters and specific grievances relevant to the feudal system under which they lived. While the common man was not probably who they were thinking of when they wrote it, democratic principles expressed in Magna Carta resonate to this day.

Discover the connections between Magna Carta and the following documents from American history. A question will appear, followed by a few documents to analyze. Answer the questions in the response boxes that follow.


Name:
Class:

Worksheet

Magna Carta's Influence on America

Making Connections

Examine the documents and text included in this activity. Fill in any blanks in the sequence with your thoughts and write your conclusion response in the space provided.

Magna Carta


In what ways have the principles of Magna Carta influenced the rhetoric (speech making) of U.S. Presidents?

[Franklin D. Roosevelt's] Third Inaugural Address


Inaugural Address of President John F. Kennedy


Enter your response
In addition to its use by presidents of the United States, Magna Carta has been used in documents which have originated in the two other branches of government. Examine the following two documents then compare and contrast the ways Magna Carta has been used in each of the three branches of government.

Joseph Hurtado, Plaintiff in Error, vs. The People of the State of California, Mr. Justice Harlan Dissenting


Clayton Antitrust Act


Enter your response
In what ways do the following two documents reflect Magna Carta and its influence on American life?

Telegram to President Wilson from Chase Osborn, Former Governor of Michigan, Regarding Emmeline Pankhurst


Eleanor Roosevelt and United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Lake Success, New York


Enter your response



1

Activity Element

Magna Carta

Page 1



2

Activity Element

[Franklin D. Roosevelt's] Third Inaugural Address

Page 6



3

Activity Element

Inaugural Address of President John F. Kennedy

Page 1



4

Activity Element

Joseph Hurtado, Plaintiff in Error, vs. The People of the State of California, Mr. Justice Harlan Dissenting

Page 1



5

Activity Element

Clayton Antitrust Act

Page 1



6

Activity Element

Telegram to President Wilson from Chase Osborn, Former Governor of Michigan, Regarding Emmeline Pankhurst

Page 1



7

Activity Element

Eleanor Roosevelt and United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Lake Success, New York

Page 1



Conclusion

Magna Carta's Influence on America

Making Connections

During the American Revolution, Magna Carta served to inspire and justify action in liberty’s defense. The colonists believed they were entitled to the same rights as Englishmen, rights guaranteed in Magna Carta. They embedded those rights into the laws of their states and later into the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights. Magna Carta was groundbreaking at the time of its inception, through the time of the American Revolution, to today.

Describe how these documents show the influence of Magna Carta on American history, giving specific examples from the text.

Your Response




Document

Magna Carta

1297

Magna Carta is widely viewed as one of the most important legal documents in the history of democracy. With this document, King John of England placed himself and England's future sovereigns and magistrates within the rule of law.

Magna Carta was written by a group of 13th-century barons to protect their rights and property against a tyrannical king. Confronted by 40 rebellious barons, King John consented to their demands in 1215 to avert a civil war (which commenced just 10 weeks later). He authorized handwritten copies to be prepared on parchment, affixed with his seal, and publicly read throughout the realm. Thus he bound not only himself, but his "heirs, for ever" to grant "to all freemen of our kingdom" the rights and liberties the great charter described.

The document is concerned with many practical matters and specific grievances relevant to the feudal system in the 1200s. The interests of the common man were hardly apparent in the minds of the men who brokered the agreement. But there are two principles expressed in Magna Carta that resonate to this day:

  • "No freeman shall be taken, imprisoned, disseised, outlawed, banished, or in any way destroyed, nor will We proceed against or prosecute him, except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land."
  • "To no one will We sell, to no one will We deny or delay, right or justice."

During the American Revolution, Magna Carta served to inspire and justify action in liberty’s defense. The colonists believed they were entitled to the same rights as Englishmen, rights guaranteed in Magna Carta.

They embedded those rights into the laws of their states and later into the Constitution and Bill of Rights. The Fifth Amendment to the Constitution ("no person shall...be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.") is a direct descendent of Magna Carta's guarantee of proceedings according to the "law of the land."

Although Magna Carta failed to resolve the conflict between King John and his barons, it was reissued several times after his death. This copy, created by Edward I, King of England, is one of four surviving originals of the 1297 Magna Carta. It is on loan to the National Archives as a gift to the American people from David M. Rubenstein.

Transcript

[This is a translation of the 1297 version of Magna Carta.]

[Preamble] Edward by the grace of God King of England, lord of Ireland and duke of Aquitaine sends greetings to all to whom the present letters come. We have inspected the great charter of the lord Henry, late King of England, our father, concerning the liberties of England in these words:

Henry by the grace of God King of England, lord of Ireland, duke of Normandy and Aquitaine and count of Anjou sends greetings to his archbishops, bishops, abbots, priors, earls, barons, sheriffs, reeves, ministers and all his bailiffs and faithful men inspecting the present charter. Know that we, at the prompting of God and for the health of our soul and the souls of our ancestors and successors, for the glory of holy Church and the improvement of our realm, freely and out of our good will have given and granted to the archbishops, bishops, abbots, priors, earls, barons and all of our realm these liberties written below to hold in our realm of England in perpetuity.

[1] In the first place we grant to God and confirm by this our present charter for ourselves and our heirs in perpetuity that the English Church is to be free and to have all its rights fully and its liberties entirely. We furthermore grant and give to all the freemen of our realm for ourselves and our heirs in perpetuity the liberties written below to have and to hold to them and their heirs from us and our heirs in perpetuity.

[2] If any of our earls or barons, or anyone else holding from us in chief by military service should die, and should his heir be of full age and owe relief, the heir is to have his inheritance for the ancient relief, namely the heir or heirs of an earl for a whole county £100, the heir or heirs of a baron for a whole barony 100 marks, the heir or heirs of a knight for a whole knight’s fee 100 shillings at most, and he who owes less will give less, according to the ancient custom of (knights’) fees.

[3] If, however, the heir of such a person is under age, his lord is not to have custody of him and his land until he has taken homage from the heir, and after such an heir has been in custody, when he comes of age, namely at twenty-one years old, he is to have his inheritance without relief and without fine, saving that if, whilst under age, he is made a knight, his land will nonetheless remain in the custody of his lords until the aforesaid term.

[4] The keeper of the land of such an heir who is under age is only to take reasonable receipts from the heir’s land and reasonable customs and reasonable services, and this without destruction or waste of men or things. And if we assign custody of any such land to a sheriff or to anyone else who should answer to us for the issues, and such a person should commit destruction or waste, we will take recompense from him and the land will be assigned to two law-worthy and discreet men of that fee who will answer to us or to the person to whom we assign such land for the land’s issues. And if we give or sell to anyone custody of any such land and that person commits destruction or waste, he is to lose custody and the land is to be assigned to two law-worthy and discreet men of that fee who similarly will answer to us as is aforesaid.

[5] The keeper, for as long as he has the custody of the land of such (an heir), is to maintain the houses, parks, fishponds, ponds, mills and other things pertaining to that land from the issues of the same land, and he will restore to the heir, when the heir comes to full age, all his land stocked with ploughs and all other things in at least the same condition as when he received it. All these things are to be observed in the custodies of archbishoprics, bishoprics, abbeys, priories, churches and vacant offices which pertain to us, save that such custodies ought not to be sold.

[6] Heirs are to be married without disparagement.

[7] A widow, after the death of her husband, is immediately and without any difficulty to have her marriage portion and her inheritance, nor is she to pay anything for her dower or her marriage portion or for her inheritance which her husband and she held on the day of her husband’s death, and she shall remain in the chief dwelling place of her husband for forty days after her husband’s death, within which time dower will be assigned her if it has not already been assigned, unless that house is a castle, and if it is a castle which she leaves, then a suitable house will immediately be provided for her in which she may properly dwell until her dower is assigned to her in accordance with what is aforesaid, and in the meantime she is to have her reasonable necessities (estoverium) from the common property. As dower she will be assigned the third part of all the lands of her husband which were his during his lifetime, save when she was dowered with less at the church door. No widow shall be distrained to marry for so long as she wishes to live without a husband, provided that she gives surety that she will not marry without our assent if she holds of us, or without the assent of her lord, if she holds of another.

[8] Neither we nor our bailiffs will seize any land or rent for any debt, as long as the existing chattels of the debtor suffice for the payment of the debt and as long as the debtor is ready to pay the debt, nor will the debtor’s guarantors be distrained for so long as the principal debtor is able to pay the debt; and should the principal debtor default in his payment of the debt, not having the means to repay it, or should he refuse to pay it despite being able to do so, the guarantors will answer for the debt and, if they wish, they are to have the lands and rents of the debtor until they are repaid the debt that previously they paid on behalf of the debtor, unless the principal debtor can show that he is quit in respect to these guarantors.

[9] The city of London is to have all its ancient liberties and customs. Moreover we wish and grant that all other cities and boroughs and vills and the barons of the Cinque Ports and all ports are to have all their liberties and free customs.

[10] No-one is to be distrained to do more service for a knight’s fee or for any other free tenement than is due from it.

[11] Common pleas are not to follow our court but are to be held in a certain fixed place.

[12] Recognisances of novel disseisin and of mort d’ancestor are not to be taken save in their particular counties and in the following way. We or, should we be outside the realm, our chief justiciar, will send our justices once a year to each county, so that, together with the knights of the counties, that may take the aforesaid assizes in the counties; and those assizes which cannot be completed in that visitation of the county by our aforesaid justices assigned to take the said assizes are to be completed elsewhere by the justices in their visitation; and those which cannot be completed by them on account of the difficulty of various articles (of law) are to be referred to our justices of the Bench and completed there.

[13] Assizes of darrein presentment are always to be taken before our justices of the Bench and are to be completed there.

[14] A freeman is not to be amerced for a small offence save in accordance with the manner of the offence, and for a major offence according to its magnitude, saving his sufficiency (salvo contenemento suo), and a merchant likewise, saving his merchandise, and any villain other than one of our own is to be amerced in the same way, saving his necessity (salvo waynagio) should he fall into our mercy, and none of the aforesaid amercements is to be imposed save by the oath of honest and law-worthy men of the neighbourhood. Earls and barons are not to be amerced save by their peers and only in accordance with the manner of their offence.

[15] No town or free man is to be distrained to make bridges or bank works save for those that ought to do so of old and by right.

[16] No bank works of any sort are to be kept up save for those that were in defense in the time of King H(enry II) our grandfather and in the same places and on the same terms as was customary in his time.

[17] No sheriff, constable, coroner or any other of our bailiffs is to hold pleas of our crown.

[18] If anyone holding a lay fee from us should die, and our sheriff or bailiff shows our letters patent containing our summons for a debt that the dead man owed us, our sheriff or bailiff is permitted to attach and enroll all the goods and chattels of the dead man found in lay fee, to the value of the said debt, by view of law-worthy men, so that nothing is to be removed thence until the debt that remains is paid to us, and the remainder is to be released to the executors to discharge the will of the dead man, and if nothing is owed to us from such a person, all the chattels are to pass to the (use of) the dead man, saving to the dead man’s wife and children their reasonable portion.

[19] No constable or his bailiff is to take corn or other chattels from anyone who not themselves of a vill where a castle is built, unless the constable or his bailiff immediately offers money in payment of obtains a respite by the wish of the seller. If the person whose corn or chattels are taken is of such a vill, then the constable or his bailiff is to pay the purchase price within forty days.

[20] No constable is to distrain any knight to give money for castle guard if the knight is willing to do such guard in person or by proxy of any other honest man, should the knight be prevented from doing so by just cause. And if we take or send such a knight into the army, he is to be quit of (castle) guard in accordance with the length of time the we have him in the army for the fee for which he has done service in the army.

[21] No sheriff or bailiff of ours or of anyone else is to take anyone’s horses or carts to make carriage, unless he renders the payment customarily due, namely for a two-horse cart ten pence per day, and for a three-horse cart fourteen pence per day. No demesne cart belonging to any churchman or knight or any other lady (sic) is to be taken by our bailiffs, nor will we or our bailiffs or anyone else take someone else’s timber for a castle or any other of our business save by the will of he to whom the timber belongs.

[22] We shall not hold the lands of those convicted of felony save for a year and a day, whereafter such land is to be restored to the lords of the fees.

[23] All fish weirs (kidelli) on the Thames and the Medway and throughout England are to be entirely dismantled, save on the sea coast.

[24] The writ called ‘praecipe’ is not to be issued to anyone in respect to any free tenement in such a way that a free man might lose his court.

[25] There is to be a single measure for wine throughout our realm, and a single measure for ale, and a single measure for Corn, that is to say the London quarter, and a single breadth for dyed cloth, russets, and haberjects, that is to say two yards within the lists. And it shall be the same for weights as for measures.

[26] Henceforth there is to be nothing given for a writ of inquest from the person seeking an inquest of life or member, but such a writ is to be given freely and is not to be denied.

[27] If any persons hold from us at fee farm or in socage or burgage, and hold land from another by knight service, we are not, by virtue of such a fee farm or socage or burgage, to have custody of the heir or their land which pertains to another’s fee, nor are we to have custody of such a fee farm or socage or burgage unless this fee farm owes knight service. We are not to have the custody of an heir or of any land which is held from another by knight service on the pretext of some small serjeanty held from us by service of rendering us knives or arrows or suchlike things.

[28] No bailiff is henceforth to put any man on his open law or on oath simply by virtue of his spoken word, without reliable witnesses being produced for the same.

[29] No freeman is to be taken or imprisoned or disseised of his free tenement or of his liberties or free customs, or outlawed or exiled or in any way ruined, nor will we go against such a man or send against him save by lawful judgement of his peers or by the law of the land. To no-one will we sell or deny of delay right or justice.

[30] All merchants, unless they have been previously and publicly forbidden, are to have safe and secure conduct in leaving and coming to England and in staying and going through England both by land and by water to buy and to sell, without any evil exactions, according to the ancient and right customs, save in time of war, and if they should be from a land at war against us and be found in our land at the beginning of the war, they are to be attached without damage to their bodies or goods until it is established by us or our chief justiciar in what way the merchants of our land are treated who at such a time are found in the land that is at war with us, and if our merchants are safe there, the other merchants are to be safe in our land.

[31] If anyone dies holding of any escheat such as the honour of Wallingford, Boulogne, Nottingham, Lancaster or of other escheats which are in our hands and which are baronies, his heir is not to give any other relief or render any other service to us that would not have been rendered to the baron if the barony were still held by a baron, and we shall hold such things in the same way as the baron held them, nor, on account of such a barony or escheat, are we to have the escheat or custody of any of our men unless the man who held the barony or the escheat held elsewhere from us in chief.

[32] No free man is henceforth to give or sell any more of his land to anyone, unless the residue of his land is sufficient to render due service to the lord of the fee as pertains to that fee.

[33] All patrons of abbeys which have charters of the kings of England over advowson or ancient tenure or possession are to have the custody of such abbeys when they fall vacant just as they ought to have and as is declared above.

[34] No-one is to be taken or imprisoned on the appeal of woman for the death of anyone save for the death of that woman’s husband.

[35] No county court is to be held save from month to month, and where the greater term used to be held, so will it be in future, nor will any sheriff or his bailiff make his tourn through the hundred save for twice a year and only in the place that is due and customary, namely once after Easter and again after Michaelmas, and the view of frankpledge is to be taken at the Michaelmas term without exception, in such a way that every man is to have his liberties which he had or used to have in the time of King H(enry II) my grandfather or which he has acquired since. The view of frankpledge is to be taken so that our peace be held and so that the tithing is to be held entire as it used to be, and so that the sheriff does not seek exceptions but remains content with that which the sheriff used to have in taking the view in the time of King H(enry) our grandfather.

[36] Nor is it permitted to anyone to give his land to a religious house in such a way that he receives it back from such a house to hold, nor is it permitted to any religious house to accept the land of anyone in such way that the land is restored to the person from whom it was received to hold. If anyone henceforth gives his land in such a way to any religious house and is convicted of the same, the gift is to be entirely quashed and such land is to revert to the lord of that fee.

[37] Scutage furthermore is to be taken as it used to be in the time of King H(enry) our grandfather, and all liberties and free customs shall be preserved to archbishops, bishops, abbots, priors, Templars, Hospitallers, earls, barons and all others, both ecclesiastical and secular persons, just as they formerly had.

All these aforesaid customs and liberties which we have granted to be held in our realm in so far as pertains to us are to be observed by all of our realm, both clergy and laity, in so far as pertains to them in respect to their own men. For this gift and grant of these liberties and of others contained in our charter over the liberties of the forest, the archbishops, bishops, abbots, priors, earls, barons, knights, fee holders and all of our realm have given us a fifteenth part of all their movable goods. Moreover we grant to them for us and our heirs that neither we nor our heirs will seek anything by which the liberties contained in this charter might be infringed or damaged, and should anything be obtained from anyone against this it is to count for nothing and to be held as nothing. With these witnesses: the lord S(tephen) archbishop of Canterbury, E(ustace) bishop of London, J(ocelin) bishop of Bath, P(eter) bishop of Winchester, H(ugh) bishop of Lincoln, R(ichard) bishop of Salisbury, W. bishop of Rochester, W(illiam) bishop of Worcester, J(ohn) bishop of Ely, H(ugh) bishop of Hereford, R(anulf) bishop of Chichester, W(illiam) bishop of Exeter, the abbot of (Bury) St Edmunds, the abbot of St Albans, the abbot of Battle, the abbot of St Augustine’s Canterbury, the abbot of Evesham, the abbot of Westminster, the abbot of Peterborough, the abbot of Reading, the abbot of Abingdon, the abbot of Malmesbury, the abbot of Winchcombe, the abbot of Hyde (Winchester), the abbot of Chertsey, the abbot of Sherborne, the abbot of Cerne, the abbot of Abbotsbury, the abbot of Milton (Abbas), the abbot of Selby, the abbot of Cirencester, H(ubert) de Burgh the justiciar, H. earl of Chester and Lincoln, W(illiam) earl of Salisbury, W(illiam) earl Warenne, G. de Clare earl of Gloucester and Hertford, W(illiam) de Ferrers earl of Derby, W(illiam) de Mandeville earl of Essex, H(ugh) Bigod earl of Norfolk, W(illiam) earl Aumale, H(umphrey) earl of Hereford, J(ohn) constable of Chester, R(obert) de Ros, R(obert) fitz Walter, R(obert) de Vieuxpont, W(illiam) Brewer, R(ichard) de Montfiquet, P(eter) fitz Herbert, W(illiam) de Aubigné, G. Gresley, F. de Braose, J(ohn) of Monmouth, J(ohn) fitz Alan, H(ugh) de Mortemer, W(illiam) de Beauchamp, W(illiam) de St John, P(eter) de Maulay, Brian de Lisle, Th(omas) of Moulton, R(ichard) de Argentan, G(eoffrey) de Neville, W(illiam) Mauduit, J(ohn) de Baalon and others. Given at Westminster on the eleventh day of February in the ninth year of our reign.

We, holding these aforesaid gifts and grants to be right and welcome, conceed and confirm them for ourselves and our heirs and by the terms of the present (letters) renew them, wishing and granting for ourselves and our heirs that the aforesaid charter is to be firmly and inviably observed in all and each of its articles in perpetuity, including any articles contained in the same charter which by chance have not to date been observed. In testimony of which we have had made these our letters patent. Witnessed by Edward our son, at Westminster on the twelfth day of October in the twenty-fifth year of our reign. (Chancery warranty by John of) Stowe.

[Translation by Professor Nicholas Vincent, Copyright Sotheby's Inc. 2007]

This primary source comes from the Collection DMRMC: David M. Rubenstein Magna Carta Collection.
National Archives Identifier: 6116690
Full Citation: Magna Carta; 1297; Collection DMRMC: David M. Rubenstein Magna Carta Collection, ; National Archives Building, Washington, DC. [Online Version, https://www.docsteach.org/documents/document/magna-carta, October 3, 2024]


Magna Carta

Page 1



Document

[Franklin D. Roosevelt's] Third Inaugural Address

1/20/1941

This primary source comes from the Collection FDR-FDRMSF: Franklin D. Roosevelt Master Speech Files.
National Archives Identifier: 2586687
Full Citation: [Franklin D. Roosevelt's] Third Inaugural Address; 1/20/1941; Collection FDR-FDRMSF: Franklin D. Roosevelt Master Speech Files, . [Online Version, https://www.docsteach.org/documents/document/[franklin-d-roosevelts]-third-inaugural-address, October 3, 2024]


[Franklin D. Roosevelt's] Third Inaugural Address

Page 1



[Franklin D. Roosevelt's] Third Inaugural Address

Page 2



[Franklin D. Roosevelt's] Third Inaugural Address

Page 3



[Franklin D. Roosevelt's] Third Inaugural Address

Page 4



[Franklin D. Roosevelt's] Third Inaugural Address

Page 5



[Franklin D. Roosevelt's] Third Inaugural Address

Page 6



[Franklin D. Roosevelt's] Third Inaugural Address

Page 7



[Franklin D. Roosevelt's] Third Inaugural Address

Page 8



[Franklin D. Roosevelt's] Third Inaugural Address

Page 9



[Franklin D. Roosevelt's] Third Inaugural Address

Page 10



Document

Press Copy, Inaugural address of President John F. Kennedy

1/20/1961

President John F. Kennedy delivered his inaugural address on January 20, 1961, announcing that "we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe to assure the survival and success of liberty." This is a press copy of Kennedy's inaugural address "as actually delivered." 

The inaugural ceremony is a defining moment in a president’s career — and no one knew this better than John F. Kennedy as he prepared for his own inauguration on January 20, 1961. He wanted his address to be short and clear, devoid of any partisan rhetoric and focused on foreign policy.

Kennedy began constructing his speech in late November, working from a speech file kept by his secretary and soliciting suggestions from friends and advisors. He wrote his thoughts in his nearly indecipherable longhand on a yellow legal pad.

While his colleagues submitted ideas, the speech was distinctly the work of Kennedy himself. Aides recounted that every sentence was worked, reworked, and reduced. The meticulously crafted piece of oratory dramatically announced a generational change in the White House. It called on the nation to combat "tyranny, poverty, disease, and war itself" and urged American citizens to participate in public service.

The climax of the speech and its most memorable phrase – "Ask not what your country can do for you – ask what you can do for your country" – was honed down from a thought about sacrifice that Kennedy had long held in his mind and had expressed in various ways in campaign speeches.

Less than six weeks after his inauguration, on March 1, President Kennedy issued an executive order establishing the Peace Corps as a pilot program within the Department of State. He envisioned the Peace Corps as a pool of trained American volunteers who would go overseas to help foreign countries meet their needs for skilled manpower. Later that year, Congress passed the Peace Corps Act, making the program permanent.
This primary source comes from the Collection JFK-3: Papers of John F. Kennedy: Presidential Papers: President's Office Files.
National Archives Identifier: 193870
Full Citation: Press Copy, Inaugural address of President John F. Kennedy; 1/20/1961; Inaugural address, 20 January 1961; Speech Files, 1961 - 1963; Collection JFK-3: Papers of John F. Kennedy: Presidential Papers: President's Office Files, ; John F. Kennedy Library, Boston, MA. [Online Version, https://www.docsteach.org/documents/document/inaugural-address-jfk, October 3, 2024]


Press Copy, Inaugural address of President John F. Kennedy

Page 1



Press Copy, Inaugural address of President John F. Kennedy

Page 2



Press Copy, Inaugural address of President John F. Kennedy

Page 3



Document

Joseph Hurtado, Plaintiff in Error, vs. The People of the State of California, Mr. Justice Harlan Dissenting

10/1883

This primary source comes from the Records of the Supreme Court of the United States.
National Archives Identifier: 6171417
Full Citation: Joseph Hurtado, Plaintiff in Error, vs. The People of the State of California, Mr. Justice Harlan Dissenting; 10/1883; Records of the Supreme Court of the United States, . [Online Version, https://www.docsteach.org/documents/document/joseph-hurtado-plaintiff-in-error-vs-the-people-of-the-state-of-california-mr-justice-harlan-dissenting, October 3, 2024]


Joseph Hurtado, Plaintiff in Error, vs. The People of the State of California, Mr. Justice Harlan Dissenting

Page 1



Joseph Hurtado, Plaintiff in Error, vs. The People of the State of California, Mr. Justice Harlan Dissenting

Page 2



Joseph Hurtado, Plaintiff in Error, vs. The People of the State of California, Mr. Justice Harlan Dissenting

Page 3



Joseph Hurtado, Plaintiff in Error, vs. The People of the State of California, Mr. Justice Harlan Dissenting

Page 4



Joseph Hurtado, Plaintiff in Error, vs. The People of the State of California, Mr. Justice Harlan Dissenting

Page 5



Joseph Hurtado, Plaintiff in Error, vs. The People of the State of California, Mr. Justice Harlan Dissenting

Page 6



Joseph Hurtado, Plaintiff in Error, vs. The People of the State of California, Mr. Justice Harlan Dissenting

Page 7



Joseph Hurtado, Plaintiff in Error, vs. The People of the State of California, Mr. Justice Harlan Dissenting

Page 8



Joseph Hurtado, Plaintiff in Error, vs. The People of the State of California, Mr. Justice Harlan Dissenting

Page 9



Joseph Hurtado, Plaintiff in Error, vs. The People of the State of California, Mr. Justice Harlan Dissenting

Page 10



Joseph Hurtado, Plaintiff in Error, vs. The People of the State of California, Mr. Justice Harlan Dissenting

Page 11



Document

Clayton Antitrust Act

10/15/1914

An Act of October 15, 1914, Public Law 63-212, 38 STAT 730, to Supplement Existing Laws Against Unlawful Restraints and Monopolies, and for Other Purposes
This primary source comes from the General Records of the United States Government.
National Archives Identifier: 6171421
Full Citation: Clayton Antitrust Act; 10/15/1914; General Records of the United States Government, . [Online Version, https://www.docsteach.org/documents/document/clayton-antitrust-act, October 3, 2024]


Clayton Antitrust Act

Page 1



Clayton Antitrust Act

Page 2



Document

Telegram to President Wilson from Chase Osborn, Former Governor of Michigan, Regarding Emmeline Pankhurst

10/21/1913

Former governor Chase Obsorn wrote to President Wilson that he favors admitting Mrs. Pankhurst because she fights for the extension of Magna Carta. It comes from an appeal of English suffragette Mrs. Emmeline Pankhurst for admittance. This document was digitized by teachers in our Primarily Teaching 2014 Summer Workshop in Washington, D.C.
This primary source comes from the Records of the Immigration and Naturalization Service.
National Archives Identifier: 12013795
Full Citation: Telegram to President Wilson from Chase Osborn, Former Governor of Michigan, Regarding Emmeline Pankhurst; 10/21/1913; 51728/017; Appeal of Mrs. Emmeline Pankhurst for admittance for visit, English Suffragette; Subject and Policy Files, 1893 - 1957; Records of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, ; National Archives Building, Washington, DC. [Online Version, https://www.docsteach.org/documents/document/telegram-governor-michigan-emmeline-pankhurst, October 3, 2024]


Telegram to President Wilson from Chase Osborn, Former Governor of Michigan, Regarding Emmeline Pankhurst

Page 1



Document

Eleanor Roosevelt and United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Lake Success, New York

11/1949

Eleanor Roosevelt considered her role in creating the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights her greatest achievement. Her work for the United Nations and on President Kennedy’s Commission on the Status of Women were two things that she focused her energy on after she left the White House. This photograph was taken in Lake Success, New York, at the temporary home of the United Nations.
This primary source comes from the Collection FDR-Photos: Franklin D. Roosevelt Library Photographs.
National Archives Identifier: 6120927
Full Citation: Photograph NPX 64-165; Eleanor Roosevelt and United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Lake Success, New York; 11/1949; Photographs of Eleanor Roosevelt, 1884 - 1962; Collection FDR-Photos: Franklin D. Roosevelt Library Photographs, ; Franklin D. Roosevelt Library, Hyde Park, NY. [Online Version, https://www.docsteach.org/documents/document/eleanor-roosevelt-declaration-human-rights, October 3, 2024]


Eleanor Roosevelt and United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Lake Success, New York

Page 1