• Login
  • Register
  • FAQ
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Documents
  • Activities
  • Activity Tools
    • All Tools
    • Analyzing Documents
    • Discussion Topic
    • Compare and Contrast
    • Zoom/Crop
    • White Out / Black Out
    • Spotlight
    • Finding a Sequence
    • Making Connections
    • Mapping History
    • Seeing the Big Picture
    • Weighing the Evidence
    • Interpreting Data
  • Popular Topics
    • See All
    • National History Day
    • The Constitution
    • Sports: All-American
    • Rights in America
    • American Indians
    • Women's Rights
    • American Revolution
    • The Civil War
    • World War I
    • World War II
    • The Vietnam War
    • 1970s America
    • Congress
    • Amending America
    • Elections
    • What Americans Eat
    • Signatures
    • Nixon and Ford Years
  • Resources
    • Getting Started
    • Document Analysis
    • Activity-Creation Guide
    • Manage Assignments
    • iPad App
    • Presentation Materials
    • Webinars
      • Recorded Webinars
      • Live Webinars
MENU
DocsTeachThe online tool for teaching with documents, from the National Archives National Archives Foundation National Archives

Court Packing vs. Reorganizing: The Supreme Court in the New Deal

Focusing on Details: Discussion Topic

Print
Created by the National Archives
Bookmark this Activity in My Activities:
Copy this Activity to My Activities for editing:
Court Packing vs. Reorganizing: The Supreme Court in the New Deal

About this Activity

  • Created by:National Archives Education Team
  • Historical Era:The Great Depression and World War II (1929-1945)
  • Thinking Skill:Historical Analysis & Interpretation
  • Bloom's Taxonomy:Analyzing
  • Grade Level:High School
Start Activity
Please use a tablet or desktop computer to use this activity.
This activity presents students with a 1937 letter written by newspaper publisher Frank Gannett opposing President Franklin Delano Roosevelt's plan to "reorganize the judiciary" (also known as his "court-packing" plan). Students will read and analyze this letter to understand Gannett's perspective on this controversial issue.
https://www.docsteach.org/activities/student/court-packing-vs-reorganizing-the-supreme-court-in-the-new-deal

Suggested Teaching Instructions

This activity can be used during a unit on the New Deal or separation of powers. For grades grades 9-12. Approximate time needed is 30 minutes.

Ask students what they already know about the Supreme Court. If needed, provide leading questions related to its role in the Federal government. These can include:

  • What does the Supreme Court do?
  • How does one become a Supreme Court justice?
  • How many Supreme Court Justices are there?
  • How long do Supreme Court Justices serve?
  • What is the proper relationship between the Supreme Court, Congress, and the President?

At the conclusion of the discussion, students should be aware that the Supreme Court interprets the law and is the final judge of constitutionality as part of judicial review, that the President nominates justices to the Supreme Court with the consent of the Senate, that there are currently 9 Supreme Court Justices (though this has varied over time from 6 to 10, there have been 9 justices since 1869), and that justices serve for life unless they are impeached, resign or retire.

Direct students to read the letter from Frank Gannett paying particular attention to the following questions:

  • What was Gannett's purpose in writing this document?
  • What claims does Gannett make in this letter?
  • What evidence does Gannett provide to support his claims?

Discuss their findings. Ask students to explain the most and least valid claims that Gannett made in his letter.

Extension Activity: Assign students to read President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s fireside chat on the reorganization of the judiciary. Ask them to respond to:

  • How does FDR's fireside chat compare with Gannett?
  • How does he respond to the type of criticism that people like Gannett were making?
  • Which argument do you find more convincing—FDR's or his critics'? Why?

Extension Activity: After reading FDR's Fireside Chat and Gannett's letter, ask students to imagine they are concerned citizens in 1937. They should write a letter to the editor for publication in a Gannett newspaper supporting either his ideas or FDR's plan to add 6 justices to the Supreme Court. Instruct them to address specific claims made by Gannett in his letter or FDR in his fireside chat in their letter.


This activity was adapted from an article published on www.archives.gov/education and in the National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS) publication Social Education: Gray, Leslie and Wynell Burroughs. "Constitutional Issues: Separation of Powers." Social Education 51, 1 (January 1987): 28-30.

Documents in this activity

  • Statement by Frank E. Gannett, of Gannett Newspapers Regarding President Franklin D. Roosevelt's Attempt to Pack the Supreme Court

CC0
To the extent possible under law, National Archives Education Team has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to "Court Packing vs. Reorganizing: The Supreme Court in the New Deal".

  • Explore Primary Source Documents
  •  
  • Discover Activities You Can Teach With
  •  
  • Create Fun & Engaging Activities
Follow us on Twitter:twitter
Follow us on Facebook:facebook
Please enter a valid email address

View our webinars:youtube

Get our iPad app:apple
New Documentsshare
New Activitiesshare

The National Archives

DocsTeach is a product of the National Archives education division. Our mission is to engage, educate, and inspire all learners to discover and explore the records of the American people preserved by the National Archives.

The National Archives and Records Administration is the nation's record keeper. We save documents and other materials created in the course of business conducted by the U.S. Federal government that are judged to have continuing value. We hold in trust for the public the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights — but also the records of ordinary citizens — at our locations around the country.
  • All Education Programs
  • Student Visits
  • Distance Learning
  • Professional Development
  • National Archives Museum
  • Presidential Libraries
  • Archives.gov
  • National Archives Foundation




Creative Commons License

Except where otherwise noted, DocsTeach is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Primary source documents included on this site generally come from the holdings of the National Archives and are in the public domain, except as noted. Teaching activities on this site have received the CC0 Public Domain Dedication; authors have waived all copyright and related rights to the extent possible under the law. See our legal and privacy page for full terms and conditions.